Skip to main content
Log in

A multiple-comparisons method based on the distribution of the root node distance of a binary tree

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposesan easy to implement cluster-based method for identifying groups of nonhom ogeneous means. The method overcomes the common problem of the classical multiple-comparison methods that lead to the construction of groups that often have substantial overlap. In addition, it solves the problem of other cluster-based methods that do not have a known level of significance and are not easy to apply. The new procedure is compared by simulation with a set of classical multiple-comparison methods and a cluster-based one. Results show that the new procedure compares quite favorably with those included in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bautista, M. G., Smith, D. W., and Steiner, R. L. (1997), «A Cluster-Based Approach to Means Separation,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2, 179–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Calinski, T., and Corsten, L. C. A. (1985), “Clustering Means in ANOVA by Simultaneous Testing,” Biometrics, 41, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmer, S. G., and Lin, W. T. (1983), “Type 1 Error Rates for Divisive Clustering Methods for Grouping Means in Analysis of Variance,” Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation, Series B, 12, 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmer, S. G., and Swanson, M. R. (1973), “An Evaluation of Ten Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures by Monte Carlo Methods,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., and Spjtvoll, E. (1982), “On Partitioning Means Into Groups,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 9, 147–152.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, C. E., and Bilbro, J. D. (1978), “Illustration of Cluster Analysis Method for Means Separation,” Agronomy Journal, 70, 462–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (1975), “Cluster Analysis as a Multiple Comparíson Method,” Applied Statistics, Proceedings of Conference at Dalhousie University, Halifax, 159–168.

  • Jolliffe, I. T., Allen, O. B., and Christie, B. R. (1989), “Comparison of Variety Means Using Cluster Analysis and Dendrograms,” Experimental Agriculture, 25, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D. E. (1981), The Art of Computer Programming (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.), Seminumerical Algorithms, Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, W. H., Flannery, P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1986), Numerical Recipes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., and Knott, M. (1974), “A Cluster Analysis Method for Grouping Means in the Analysis of Variance,” Biometrics, 30, 507–512.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, J. P. (1981), “Complexity: An Interpretability Criterion for Multiple Comparisons,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 395–401.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spath, H. (1980), Cluster Analysis Algorithms, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasaki, T., Yoden, A., and Goto, M. (1987), “Graphical Data Analysis in Comparative Experimental Studies,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 5, 113–125.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Willavize, S. A., Carmer, S. G., and Walker, W. M. (1980), “Evaluation of Cluster Analysis for Comparing Treatment Means,” Agronomy Journal, 72, 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Di Rienzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Rienzo, J.A., Guzman, A.W. & Casanoves, F. A multiple-comparisons method based on the distribution of the root node distance of a binary tree. JABES 7, 129–142 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1198/10857110260141193

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/10857110260141193

Key Words

Navigation